Site Slogan

What can we help you with today?

House Votes To Increase Funding To Municipalities

House Votes To Increase Funding To Municipalities

CT News Junkie, February 25, 2021

By Christine Stuart

The House of Representatives has emergency-certified several bills. One increases funding to municipalities, changes tax penalties for commuters, and eliminates welfare liens. 

“We want to put a marker down in negotiations with all the parties, Republicans and Democrats and the executive branch, that PILOT is going to be really, really critical to this budget,” House Speaker Matt Ritter said Monday before the vote.

The bill passed 125 to 24. One Democrat, Rep. Pat Boyd, joined 23 Republican lawmakers in voting against it.  

The bill would increase funding to municipalities by more than $100 million, but doesn’t say how lawmakers would pay for it because that’s part of the budget process. 

Republicans struggled with the idea of lumping PILOT funding, the convenience tax, and elimination of welfare liens into one bill. 

“All of them deserve our attention but are they critical to do at this time?,” Rep. Holly Cheeseman, R-East Lyme, said.  

Emergency certifying the bills means they didn’t go through the legislative process and that there’s some type of emergency happening that requires immediate attention. 

Cheeseman said it’s probably appropriate to address the convenience tax so that Connecticut residents aren’t taxed twice by New York and Massahcusetts if they telecommuted during the 2020 pandemic. 

“We do not want our residents who have gone through so much to be subjected to that double taxation,” Cheeseman said. “It makes perfect sense to address that now.”   

The language would prohibit Connecticut from taxing residents during the 2020 tax year if they worked remotely for a company in another state due to COVID-19.

As far as the property lien on welfare recipients, Ritter said it’s not fair to put a lien on someone’s house 30 years after they received help from the government, but that’s what currently happens in Connecticut and New York. He said he hopes Connecticut becomes the 49th state to eliminate the practice. 

There are about 1,300 Connecticut residents per year that may be impacted by this law. 


Keep the promise back to top

As far as PILOT, which stands for payment in lieu of taxes, Cheeseman said the legislature breaks their promise to fund the program every year. She said she hopes they are able to find the funding to give more to cities and towns for non-taxable property. 

“If this doesn’t happen, if we don’t live up to our word in the legislature, I think we should come back with a resolution to change our motto from the Land of Steady Habits to the Land of Broken Promises,” Cheeseman said. 

Republican House Minority Leader Vincent Candelora called the vote on PILOT ceremonial.  

“The fact that there’s no appropriation that comes along with this. You know it doesn’t provide that level of certainty,” Candelora said. 

He said, “We’ll see as we move through the budget process if towns are going to be given the money that they’ve been promised.”

Joe DeLong, executive director of the Connecticut Conference of Municipalities, said cities and towns are looking for something that’s sustainable and predictable when it comes to PILOT. 

“While it doesn’t help every city and town in Connecticut, it doesn’t hurt any either,” DeLong said. 

But cities and towns are not going to count on the money until it’s appropriated. 

“Like anything, our members aren’t counting the dollars until they receive them,” DeLong said. 

Ritter said the amount of money towns receive could change if the formula changes. 

“We want them to feel confident that they can rely on some of these figures so they don’t have to produce in New Haven a mill rate increase of 12 for example,” Ritter said. “So that’s why we’re doing this now.”

Bridgeport is receiving an additional $5 million in PILOT funds under this proposal. No other city or town was given a specific amount or carve-out as part of the new formula. 

“This new formula, there’s no guarantees,” Rep. Rosa Rebimbas said. 

She said there are no guarantee this won’t carry with it new taxes. 

“There is nothing in this bill that states there will be no new taxes. It simply states that cities will be now grouped based on the tiers,” Rep. Sean Scanlon, D-Guilford, said.