May 14, 2009
Public safety workers seek new costly, unjustified benefits
The Connecticut Conference of Municipalities (CCM) today (Thursday, May
14, 2009)) released a major new public policy report entitled "Special
Benefits for Public Safety Employees - Why the Mega-Mandate Should Be
Rejected" which exposes a titanic proposed state mandate (HB 6194) that
would break the backs of towns and cities and their hard-pressed
property taxpayers
(See attachment below for complete report.)
The legislation would overturn the foundation of the workers'
compensation system by mandating new, unjustified, and costly benefits
for cancers and infectious and contagious diseases for all local public
safety workers
These costly, unfunded and unnecessary mandates would not require such
employees to show the origin of their illnesses, and would fundamentally
shift the burden to towns and cities to show the illnesses are not
job-related.
"We are in the middle of the most significant recession in half a
century," noted Jim Finley, CCM Executive Director and CEO. "Towns and
cities are going underwater fiscally with the forecast of more rain over
the next several years. How can the General Assembly consider mandating
costly, unjustified, new benefits when mayors and first selectmen from
across the state are being forced to lay off employees?"
HB 6194 is part of a nationwide campaign to provide all local police
officers and firefighters - paid and volunteer - with special workers'
compensation benefits at the expense of local taxpayers.
The Labor Committee and Public Safety Committees have already favorably
reported HB 6194, which would unfairly and dramatically expand the
workers' compensation benefits system for public safety employees - and
indisputably cost towns millions. Such a toxic public policy proposal
completely ignores our current economic crisis and disregards the
severity of this recession's impact on communities and households
statewide. HB 6194 would pour fuel on an already raging fiscal fire in
towns throughout Connecticut.
Special Benefits for Public Safety Employees - Why the Mega-mandate Should Be Rejected
Public Policy Report
SPECIAL BENEFITS FOR
PUBLIC SAFETY EMPLOYEESWHY
THE MEGAMANDATE
SHOULD BE REJECTED
May 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- INTRODUCTION
- POTENTIAL MAJOR FISCAL IMPACT:
- Infectious & Contagious Diseases
- Cancer
- Increased Insurance Rates
- SETTING THE MEDICAL RECORD STRAIGHT
- Cancer
- Infectious & Contagious Diseases
- CONCLUSION
This document is in .PDF format. A free Adobe Acrobat viewer is available from Adobe here.
|