|
April 17, 2009
CT Communities' 2010 Financial Outlook Is Grim
By DON STACOM
Reprinted from The Hartford Courant
The economic nose dive is driving Connecticut communities this year to
slash services, lay off employees and raise taxes.
By next spring, could these look like the good old days?
While they struggle to balance their books through the worst year in
memory, municipal and school leaders are also looking ahead to 2010 -
and their projections are grim.
Communities are scrambling for short-term fixes, but many of those
solutions - reserve funds, stimulus money, one-time employee concessions
- won't be available next time around. And next year, municipal pension
plans will start showing the real damage of the Wall Street meltdown.
"Any public official who is banking on next year being better is being,
well, less than honest or is suffering from severe denial," West
Hartford Mayor Scott Slifka said.
"I would predict that many programs/jobs [statewide] that are 'saved' in
the current year will face elimination in the next year," he said.
Unless the state suspends mandates or boosts education aid, "we are
about to fall off a cliff," cautioned Bristol Superintendent Philip
Streifer.
What to do? Recommendations vary, but three points win broad consensus:
Huge property tax increases won't work, local government must be
permanently restructured, and the state mandates that once were merely
inconvenient are now flat-out unaffordable.
Last week, The Courant contacted six municipal and school leaders who
were among the first to identify the severity of the economic downturn
last fall. They agree that an economic recovery would sharply improve
the forecast; otherwise, the state should brace for more turbulence in
2010.
The chief problem is that the easiest-to-find savings will be gone. Much
like families selling their SUVs or canceling cable service, towns are
grabbing all the "low-hanging fruit" this year to make ends meet. That
means tougher choices next time if more cuts are needed.
Plainville Town Manager Robert Lee summed it up this way: "Most of the
'moderately difficult savings' have been wrung out of the budget."
Some examples:
- In the midst of this economic downpour, towns are raiding their rainy
day funds. But if the rain is still falling next year, that money won't
be available.
- Much of the federal stimulus money should be gone by then, too. Some
funding extends into 2010-11, but at lower levels.
- Many city unions are reluctantly accepting wage freezes or givebacks
this year; the resistance to a second round is likely to be tougher.
- Postponing vehicle replacements and building repairs now will cluster
extra expenses in 2010, when another year of delays may prove
impossible.
And starting in mid-2010, many communities will have to pony up big
money to cover pension fund losses. Bills for pension contributions lag
nearly a year, so towns now are making up for investment losses before
last summer. The worst effects of the collapse will hit next winter.
Slifka projects that for many towns, the impact looks to be
"staggering."
Homeowners are already under strain, so big property tax increases
aren't feasible, officials agree.
"The ability for taxpayers to pay their taxes is obviously in question
with high unemployment," said Bristol Comptroller Glenn Klocko. "If they
can't pay today's tax levels, how can they support tomorrow's levels?"
Streifer projects his schools need annual 1-mill increases for years to
keep up with mandates and special education inflation, and acknowledges
bluntly, "That is unsustainable."
He questioned why the General Assembly won't suspend costly state
regulations.
"The state is just not interested in acting in this arena," he said.
Change at the local level is inevitable, officials agreed. Farmington
Valley towns, traditionally hard-line advocates of home rule, are open
to cooperation now.
"We need to use this year to look at structural changes in government
that will help us get through the future difficult years, such as
regional collaborative efforts, regional dispatch systems and sharing
staff," Simsbury First Selectman Mary Glassman said.
Manchester has been reducing staff for years, and is doing away with
defined-benefit pensions for non-union workers.
"Municipal operations are well into a permanent state of scarce
resources," Manchester General Manager Scott Shanley said. "Illusion now
will just prolong the crisis. I don't mean to be negative, but also
don't want to be caught unaware. The challenge is, we just don't know
what's ahead."
Shanley sees a positive side: The challenges of 2010 can be predicted,
unlike the sudden nationwide implosion last year.
"At least for next year we have more time to plan," he said. "We are
already on it."
|