|
February 11, 2009
Federal stimulus may have negative effects on state
By Mary E. O'Leary
Reprinted from The New Haven Register
How the U.S. House and Senate reconcile differences in the federal
stimulus package will determine how much of a shortfall Gov. M. Jodi
Rell faces in her proposed biennium budget.
The U.S. Senate Tuesday approved an $838 billion stimulus bill that cut
$40 billion from a $79 billion stabilization program, which will drop
Connecticut's share over the next two years by $430 million, according
to state analysts.
This includes $359 million that Rell wanted to use to maintain the
Educational Cost Sharing grant to towns next year, one of the hallmarks
of her budget plan, and $70 million in additional Medicaid funds it was
hoped would cover increased use of the program.
"We are in constant touch with the congressional offices," said Jeffrey
Beckham, spokesman for the state's Office of Policy Analysis, as the
state lobbies for a final bill closer to the U.S. House's $830 billion,
with more money for stabilization.
Beckham said if the $359 million in education aid does not materialize,
the state will have to cut elsewhere in the two-year budget.
Democrats have already been critical that, based on estimates from the
nonpartisan Office of Fiscal Analysis, Rell's proposed $38.4 billion
budget for fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2011 is $2.6 billion short and depends
on one-time expenditures to cover $3.4 billion over two years.
At some point, Beckham said, the they will have to reconcile the
estimates, which will be clearer when the April tax returns are in.
The deficit for this year is estimated at $1.3 billion, of which $600
million has already been cut, with Democrats hoping to vote on more cuts
by Feb. 27, although they did not have details Tuesday.
State Sen. Majority Leader Martin M. Looney, D-New Haven, said a big
worry is that, as the economy tanks, the quarterly tax estimates paid by
businesses to the state may have been too generous, necessitating the
state to issue substantial refunds.
Rell, over the weekend, also floated a retirement incentive plan that
would apply to workers at least 55 years old with 10 years experience.
She wants the legislature to take action on it quickly and to put it
into effect by the end of March.
Rell's budget office estimated 3,000 out of some 9,000 eligible would
take a buyout that would add three years to their pension plan and
continue health care, which would be exempt from future changes.
There are no details beyond that, and union representatives were taken
aback that it was made public at this point, when there was an agreement
to not issue statements as negotiations on job cuts proceeded.
Looney said in previous buyouts, critical departments, such as
transportation, "have been hollowed out," with a lot of institutional
knowledge lost. If large numbers of correctional guards or state police
took up the offer, replacements would have to be hired, negating any
savings.
U.S. Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., said he was disappointed with the
Senate package, but voted for it, "because failure to take any action to
stop our economic downturn - and quickly - would have a far worse
effect. I am hopeful that as the two bills' differences are reconciled
we will have the opportunity to increase the funding for Connecticut."
|