|
May 18, 2007
More than 100 CT municipalities and school districts save money on electric purchasing through CCM
Recent reports by news media and others have stated that some towns
(i.e. Cheshire, Waterford, and Wethersfield) have received a "raw
deal" in the competitive electric market. In fact, the problems in
these towns are with the vendor that serves the school board. The town
governments in Cheshire and Waterford, for example, are served by CCM
Energy and there are no problems.
These news reports (1) are not related to electric supply contracts
procured through the CCM Energy program, a service program of the
Connecticut Conference of Municipalities (CCM); and (2) do not reflect
the cost-savings achieved by the more than 100 municipalities and school
districts in CCM Energy's electric purchasing program.
According to Rudie Beers, Director of Finance for the Town of Waterford:
"Contrary to some news reports, the Town has saved - because of CCM
- about $139,000 in 2005-2006 and anticipates saving more than $250,000
in 2007 compared to utility pricing. We have been very impressed with
CCM's professionalism, including their ongoing support during the term
of our supply contract. CCM is always there when we need them."
CCM's program provides all the information needed by town and school
officials to make an informed decision regarding the purchase of
electricity in the competitive market. The cornerstone of our program
is negotiating complete supply contracts with multiple bidders,
reviewing those complete supply contracts with the community before
seeking any prices, and then obtaining pricing from multiple bidders
based on those fully negotiated supply contracts. This emphasis on
complete negotiation of and review of supply contracts before requesting
a price has several advantages.
- First, this approach maintains competitive pressure on the price
until that price is finalized.
- Second, this approach maximizes the
competitive pressure on the terms and conditions that underlie that
price.
- Third, and most importantly, this up-front emphasis on the
contract allows CCM to review the complete contract with the community,
well before any bids are received. CCM's review with the community
includes each contract's approach to pass through costs that will be
added to the bid price.
Given the magnitude of new regulatory charges, CCM also insists on
requesting two sets of prices from suppliers, one reflecting an "all
in price" with no additional pass through costs, and the other
allowing only those pass through costs previously negotiated with
suppliers. We know of no better way to highlight and make transparent
the potential magnitude of these charges.
The hallmark of the CCM Energy Purchasing Program is its emphasis upon
contract negotiation and contract review with its member towns, cities,
their school districts and local public agencies. CCM's objective
is to put its members in the position of making well-informed contract
decisions to save their taxpayers money.
The initial group of nine communities to join CCM Energy (the first in
Connecticut to transition from utility-based pricing to the competitive
electric market) will save $1,875,000 during the term of their current
supply contracts as compared with the cost of utility-provided
electricity. Every one of these nine communities has elected to use
CCM's procurement program again to obtain a second multi-year
electric supply contract. CCM Energy is the gold standard of electric
purchasing programs in Connecticut.
Complete list of municipalities
and school districts enrolled in the
CCM Energy Electric Purchasing Consortium
| Type | Participant |
| B | Andover |
| B | Ashford |
| T | Avon |
| S | Avon Schools |
| T | Bethlehem |
| B | Bolton |
| B | Branford |
| T | Bristol |
| T | Burlington |
| S | Canterbury Schools |
| T | Cheshire |
| B | Columbia |
| B | Coventry |
| B | Cromwell |
| T | Deep River |
| T | East Haddam |
| B | East Hampton |
| B | East Hartford |
| T | East Lyme |
| T | East Windsor |
| S | East Windsor Schools |
| O | East Windsor WPCA |
| T | Eastford |
| S | Easton |
| T | Ellington |
| B | Enfield |
| O | Enfield Housing Authority |
| T | Franklin |
| T | Goshen |
| S | Granby |
| T | Groton |
| B | Hamden |
| T | Kent |
| T | Killingly |
| T | Killingworth |
| B | Lebanon |
| B | Ledyard |
| B | Manchester |
| B | Mansfield |
|
|
| Type | Participant |
| B | Marlborough |
| S | Middletown Schools |
| T | Milford |
| S | Milford Schools |
| S | Naugatuck Schools |
| B | New London |
| T | Norfolk |
| B | North Haven |
| T | North Stonington |
| T | Old Lyme |
| S | Old Saybrook |
| B | Orange |
| T | Plainfield |
| B | Plainville |
| B | Portland |
| T | Prospect |
| T | Redding |
| S | RSD #18 |
| S | RSD #19 |
| B | Somers |
| T | South Windsor |
| S | South Windsor Schools |
| T | Southington |
| T | Sprague |
| S | Sprague Schools |
| O | Sprague WPCA |
| T | Stonington |
| T | Suffield |
| B | Thompson |
| B | Tolland |
| T | Torrington |
| B | Trumbull |
| T | Vernon |
| B | Voluntown |
| T | Washington |
| T | Waterford |
| T | Westport |
| B | Wilton |
| B | Woodstock |
|
|
B = Town & Schools
S = Schools
T = Town
O = Other
|
|